Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Paty vs Jiri Barnat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paty vs Barnat analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Paty vs Jiri Barnat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paty 2 - 0 Barnat
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paty has won 56.85% of points on their second serve, while Barnat has won 51.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paty, in recent form, has won 46.43% of their opponent's second serve points, while Barnat has won 48.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.41% and 36.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paty has saved 46.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barnat has saved 40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paty has won 60% of matches played (W/L 27/ 18), with Barnat winning 52% (W/L 26/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 96/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Barnat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/ 18), where as Barnat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paty winning 2 times and Barnat being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Paty winning 4 and Barnat winning 1. The last match between Paty and Barnat was at the M25 Bielsko Biala, 18-08-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory 6-2 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paty and Barnat have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paty winning 1 times and Barnat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paty winning 1, and Barnat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paty has played against opponents with an average rank of 136.4 while Barnat has played against players with an average rank of 213.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paty has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barnat has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paty has converted 44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barnat has converted 52.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
685
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
762
Rank
578
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
54% (110-95)
Career Total W/L
56% (114-88)
67% (6-3)
YTD W/L
46% (6-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Paty | Jiri Barnat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 20 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:30 | 1:53:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (118/193) | 62% (95/154) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (81/118) | 72% (68/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (40/75) | 51% (30/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 11% (2/19) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (56/154) | 37% (72/193) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Daniel Paty
Player
Jiri Barnat
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Jiri Barnat
62%
(
70 of
113)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Paty | Jiri Barnat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 46% (6/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 48% (15/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (96/78) | 50% (140/138) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:20 | 1:36:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 160.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (286/483) | 58% (497/855) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (223/286) | 63% (311/497) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (112/197) | 52% (186/358) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (22/50) | 52% (46/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (225/564) | 41% (365/882) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Mariano Tammaro
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Matthias Ujvary
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tobias Smoliner
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Daniel Paty
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jiri Barnat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Jiri Barnat
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Jiri Barnat
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Thomas Deschamps
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Jan Kupcic
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nico Hipfl
Player
Jiri Barnat
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Jiri Barnat
35%
(
19 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Martins Rocens
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
2
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandre Metreveli
Player
Jiri Barnat
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Jiri Barnat
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paty Vs Barnat Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Paty
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
